Re: [sig-nir] Brief report -- NIR System BoF

To: maem at maem dot org
Subject: Re: [sig-nir] Brief report -- NIR System BoF
From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic dot ad dot jp>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 06:43:05 +0900 (JST)
Cc: sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net, nir-system at nic dot ad dot jp, yamasaki at nic dot ad dot jp,anne at apnic dot net, connie at apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <200409022038.ECJ23303.BFNN@maem.org>
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-nir>
List-help: <mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: "APNIC SIG for National Internet Registries \(NIRs\)"<sig-nir.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-nir@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir>,<mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir>,<mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4136994A.30400@nic.ad.jp><Pine.LNX.4.44.0409021416400.7769-100000@durian.apnic.net><200409022038.ECJ23303.BFNN@maem.org>

I would like to volunteer.

Izumi
JPNIC

From: MAEMURA Akinori <maem at maem dot org>
Subject: Re: [sig-nir] Brief report -- NIR System BoF
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:39:47 +0900

> | One thing i forgot to add : traditionally all the BOFs are reported
> | separately at the Member Meeting. My only question was about this
> | Systems meeting because I just wasnt sure if it was a BoF, but as it
> | was reported previously it does seem appropriate to have as short 
> | report tomorrow as well.
> | 
> But not always. ( one out of two, Shin?)
> 
> Okay just have them ( Systems and Policy Process ) reported 
> in AMM and see.
> 
> Any volunteer from NIR Policy Process BoF?
> 
> Regards,
> Akinori
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sig-nir mailing list
> sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir
> 
>