Re: [sig-nir] Brief report -- NIR System BoF

To: MAEMURA Akinori <maem at maem dot org>
Subject: Re: [sig-nir] Brief report -- NIR System BoF
From: Shin Yamasaki <yamasaki at nic dot ad dot jp>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 09:56:06 +1200
Cc: sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net, nir-system at nic dot ad dot jp, anne at apnic dot net,connie at apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <200409022038.ECJ23303.BFNN@maem.org>
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-nir>
List-help: <mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: "APNIC SIG for National Internet Registries \(NIRs\)"<sig-nir.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-nir@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir>,<mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir>,<mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: JPNIC
References: <4136994A.30400@nic.ad.jp> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0409021416400.7769-100000@durian.apnic.net><200409022038.ECJ23303.BFNN@maem.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803

| One thing i forgot to add : traditionally all the BOFs are reported
| separately at the Member Meeting. My only question was about this
| Systems meeting because I just wasnt sure if it was a BoF, but as it
| was reported previously it does seem appropriate to have as short | report tomorrow as well.
| But not always. ( one out of two, Shin?)

That's correct.

Okay just have them ( Systems and Policy Process ) reported in AMM and see.

I mentioned to Anne and sent a few slides to her.

Any volunteer from NIR Policy Process BoF?

Regards,
Akinori

_______________________________________________
sig-nir mailing list
sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir