[sig-nir] Re: [sig-policy] Final call for comments: [prop-031-v002] "Pro

  • To: Savenaca Vocea <save at apnic dot net>
  • Subject: [sig-nir] Re: [sig-policy] Final call for comments: [prop-031-v002] "Proposal to amend APNIC IPv6 assignment and utilisation requirement policy"
  • From: David Chen <david at twnic dot net dot tw>
  • Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:46:00 +0800
  • Cc: sig-nir at apnic dot net, sig-policy at apnic dot net
  • In-reply-to: <83EC5982-4686-4ECE-B38E-8CF9E4337CE6 at apnic dot net>
  • List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-nir>
  • List-help: <mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
  • List-id: "APNIC SIG for National Internet Registries \(NIRs\)" <sig-nir.lists.apnic.net>
  • List-post: <mailto:sig-nir@lists.apnic.net>
  • List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir>, <mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
  • List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir>, <mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
  • References: <83EC5982-4686-4ECE-B38E-8CF9E4337CE6@apnic.net>
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
    • Hi all, I'm David Chen. I would like to confirm that if IPv6 HD ratio is amended from 0.8 to 0.94, will the utilisation be changed to a higher number under HD 0.94 in the fee schedule? As I know in the APNIC fee schedule, IPv6 per-address fee is calculated according to current HD ratio requirement. http://www.apnic.net/docs/corpdocs/member-fee-schedule.html. Following this rule, it would be a big influence on per-address fee.
      For example,
      
      The utilisation number of /48s for /32 under HD ratio 0.8 is 7,132. The total per-address fee payable for an allocation of /32 to a "Very Large" member is calculated as : 7,132 * 0.03 = $213.96
      
      
      If under HD ratio 0.94, then the utilisation number of /48s for /32 is around 33,690. The total per-address fee payable for an allocation of /32 to a "Very Large" member is calculated as : 33,690 * 0.03 = $1,010.7
      
      Am I right? Please clarify this for me, thanks.
      
      Regards,
      
      David Chen
      
      
      Save Vocea wrote:
      
      
      Dear colleagues
      
      
      APNIC welcomes comments, questions, and suggestions on the following policy
      proposal:
      
      ____________________
      
      Final call for comments: [prop-031-v002]
      
      "Proposal to amend APNIC IPv6 assignment and utilisation requirement policy"
      ____________________
      
      This is the final call for comments on policy proposal [prop-031-v002]
      
      "Proposal to amend APNIC IPv6 assignment and utilisation requirement policy".
      
      Version one of this proposal was discussed at APNIC 20. The proposal to
      amend the IPv6 HD ratio from 0.8 to 0.94 reached consensus and is now
      documented in [prop-031-v002]. Other parts of proposal [prop-031-v001]
      did not reach consensus.
      
      
      Regarding the amendment of the IPv6 HD ratio, the following consensus was
      reached:
      
         "The SIG accepted by consensus the proposed policy process,
          which requires the text proposal to be sent to the mailing
          list one month before the meeting, an eight week comment
          period on the mailing list after the meeting, and final
          endorsement from EC."
      
      This proposal is now submitted to the sig-policy mailing list for an
      eight week discussion period. At the end of that period, if consensus
      appears to have been achieved, the Chair of the Policy SIG will
      ask the Executive Council to endorse the proposal for implementation.
      
      *   Send all comments and questions to:   <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
      *   Deadline for comments:                  16 November 2005
      
      _____________________________________________________________________
      
      Proposal details
      _____________________________________________________________________
      
      Authors:    Stephan Millet  <stephan (a) telstra.net>
                  Geoff Huston    <gih (a) apnic.net>
      
      Version:    2.0
      
      Date:       19 September 2005
      
      Purpose
      -------
      
      To amend the APNIC IPv6 address allocation policies regarding the
      definition of the threshold value for end-site allocation efficiency.
      
      These measures, if undertaken generally by all RIRs, and assuming that
      further measures are undertaken by the addressing community regarding
      the general adoption of an end-site allocation size that would be
      substantially smaller than the existing default value of a /48, would
      increase the anticipated useful lifetime of IPv6 to encompass a period
      in excess of 100 years, in which case no further allocation policy
      changes would be anticipated.
      
      
      Proposal
      --------
      
      To amend the IPv6 threshold end site allocation utilisation level to
      that matching an HD Ratio value of 0.94.
      
      
      Impact summary
      --------------
      
        End users:
      
          There is no impact arising from this policy proposal.
      
      
        ISPs and LIRs:
      
          With the higher threshold end-site allocation efficiency level,
          when based on a 0.94 HD Ratio, ISPs will need to undertake network
          address plans according to this target level.
      
      
        NIRs:
      
      
      These proposed policy changes are not anticipated to have any impact on
          NIR operation, other than implementation of a 0.94 density metric
          to replace the existing 0.80 value, as per APNIC policy.
      
      
        APNIC:
      
          APNIC will need to amend its IPv6 criteria to reflect the altered
          HD ratio.
      
      
      Background material
      -------------------
      
      This material is not formally part of the policy proposal. It is
      included here only for informational purposes.
      
      
      1. Paper: The IPv6 Address Plan
         http://www.potaroo.net/ispcol/2005-07/ipv6size.html
         Geoff Huston
      
      2. Internet Draft: draft-narten-iana-rir-ipv6-considerations-00.txt
         http://draft-narten-iana-rir-ipv6-considerations.potaroo.net/
         Thomas Narten
      
      3. Internet Draft: draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-00.txt
         http://draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary.potaroo.net/
         Thomas Narten
         Geoff Huston
         Lea Roberts
      
      
      ____________________
      
      References
      ____________________
      
      Proposal details including full text of proposal, presentations, links
      to relevant meeting minutes, and links to mailing list discussions are
      available at:
      
           http://www.apnic.net/docs/policy/proposals/prop-031-v002.html
      
      
      --
      Savenaca Vocea, Policy Development Manager, APNIC   <save at apnic dot net>
      
      http:// www.apnic.net ph/fx +61 7 3858 3100/99
      
      
      
      
      
      
      * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
      _______________________________________________
      sig-policy mailing list
      sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
      http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy