[sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Re: Decicion :[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6p

To: "'Philip Smith'" <pfs at cisco dot com>
Subject: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Re: Decicion :[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6peraddressfeeforNIRs"
From: "Chanki Park" <ckp at nic dot or dot kr>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:48:07 +0900
Cc: sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net, sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <43867F8B.4080604 at cisco dot com>
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-nir>
List-help: <mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: "APNIC SIG for National Internet Registries \(NIRs\)" <sig-nir.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-nir@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir>, <mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir>, <mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcXxbT72G504EEaVSE2qEgVDY+HsxQABZWgg

> I'm glad we now agree on one thing.
> 
> So who is going to take the lead in moving this forward...? Not much
> time between now and the end of January if this is going to 
> get another
> airing at APNIC 21...
> 


Good...

However, we have to fix the mistake first.
Then let's decide what to do next.

Regards,

Chanki