[sig-nir] Re: [sig-policy] Re: Decicion :[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6p

To: "Chanki Park" <ckp at nic dot or dot kr>, "'Philip Smith'" <pfs at cisco dot com>
Subject: [sig-nir] Re: [sig-policy] Re: Decicion :[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6peraddressfeeforNIRs"
From: Stephan Millet <stephan at telstra dot net>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:53:42 +1100
Cc: sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net, sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <200511250348.jAP3m6a28748 at mail.nic dot or dot kr>
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-nir>
List-help: <mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: "APNIC SIG for National Internet Registries \(NIRs\)" <sig-nir.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-nir@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir>, <mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir>, <mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200511250348.jAP3m6a28748@mail.nic.or.kr>
Reply-to: stephan@telstra.net
User-agent: KMail/1.5.4

>
> However, we have to fix the mistake first.

And the mistake being what ??? We don't agree with the KRNIC position ?


Stephan Millet