[sig-nir] Re: [sig-policy] Re: Decicion :[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6p

To: stephan at telstra dot net
Subject: [sig-nir] Re: [sig-policy] Re: Decicion :[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6peraddressfeeforNIRs"
From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic dot ad dot jp>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:09:29 +0900
Cc: sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net, sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <200511251453.42480.stephan at telstra dot net>
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-nir>
List-help: <mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: "APNIC SIG for National Internet Registries \(NIRs\)" <sig-nir.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-nir@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir>, <mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir>, <mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200511250348.jAP3m6a28748@mail.nic.or.kr> <200511251453.42480.stephan@telstra.net>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)

Let's confirm with the EC whether it was the wrong decision as I
mentioned on the mailing list yesterday.

Dear EC members on the list,
Would you please review the decision and the process and provide us with
your position on whether the consensus decision was unrighteously
declared as some members on this mailing list believe?

Regards,
Izumi Okutani
NIR SIG Chair

Stephan Millet wrote:
>>Good...
>>
>>However, we have to fix the mistake first.
> 
> 
> And the mistake being what ??? We don't agree with the KRNIC position ?
> 
> 
> Stephan Millet
> 
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>