RE: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus decision ofPRO

To: "'Chanki Park'" <ckp at nic dot or dot kr>, <sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net>, <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
Subject: RE: [sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Regarding the no consensus decision ofPROP-028-v001
From: "Chanki Park" <ckp at nic dot or dot kr>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:05:05 +0900
Cc:
In-reply-to:
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-nir>
List-help: <mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: "APNIC SIG for National Internet Registries \(NIRs\)" <sig-nir.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-nir@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir>, <mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir>, <mailto:sig-nir-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcX1k7JIgmjBWmTgToOGFj1/loTdCwAgLuBgAPzLSsAAAG2CoA==

> Conclusion
> Our PDP is not weak enough to alter the final result by a few people. 
                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It should be:

Our PDP is weak enough to alter the final result by a few people. 

sorry...

Chanki