Re: [sig-policy] Policy Proposal for End Site allocation policy for IPv6

To: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic dot ad dot jp>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Policy Proposal for End Site allocation policy for IPv6
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 18:07:35 -1000
Cc: Save Vocea <save at apnic dot net>, sig-policy at apnic dot net
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <6.2.0.14.2.20060318054818.02ef9818@localhost> <44A4BBBE.7060100@nic.ad.jp>

> assignment? I recall there were some discussions over creating
> guidelines(or recommendations) for LIRs in the ARIN region, and
> wondering how it will apply in our region.
> 
> This would probably affect people's position over the proposal, so I
> hope someone (Geoff or Randy?) could help me clarify this point.

it would still be on an as justified basis.  this is just removes
the dependency of HD calc from actual allocation size.

randy