Re: [sig-policy] Policy Proposal for End Site allocation policy for IPv6

To: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic dot ad dot jp>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Policy Proposal for End Site allocation policy for IPv6
From: Save Vocea <save at apnic dot net>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 11:38:17 +1000
Cc: sig-policy at apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <44A88ED7.40608 at nic dot ad dot jp>
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <6.2.0.14.2.20060318054818.02ef9818@localhost> <44A4BBBE.7060100@nic.ad.jp> <17573.62727.299147.483957@roam.psg.com> <44A87DDE.2020700@nic.ad.jp> <17576.35889.33024.130503@roam.psg.com> <44A88ED7.40608@nic.ad.jp>

Izumi,

On 03/07/2006, at 1:28 PM, Izumi Okutani wrote:

One more question I have is whether this proposal removes the
currently /48 boundary for requiring second opinion requests.


oops!  we are entering territory i do not know well.  perhaps
geoff or someone else should speak.

:-) yes, someone had also pointed out to me that there are no second
opinion requests in ARIN.
In AP, LIRs are required to submit a second opinion request to APNIC
hostmaster if they make assignments shorter than /48.

It may sound a little operational to discuss it here, but I'm pretty
sure that I'd get these questions from LIRs in JP, so it would help if
someone could answer this point for me.


The practice for second opinion request to APNIC for assignments
shorter than /48 will remain as stated in the current policy.

Save