Re: [sig-policy] Policy Proposal for End Site allocation policy for IPv6
- To: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic dot ad dot jp>
- Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Policy Proposal for End Site allocation policy for IPv6
- From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 19:49:45 -1000
- Cc: Save Vocea <save at apnic dot net>, sig-policy at apnic dot net
- List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
- List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
- List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
- List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
- List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <6.2.0.14.2.20060318054818.02ef9818@localhost> <44A4BBBE.7060100@nic.ad.jp> <17573.62727.299147.483957@roam.psg.com> <44A87DDE.2020700@nic.ad.jp> <17576.35889.33024.130503@roam.psg.com> <44A88ED7.40608@nic.ad.jp>
> popular in JP. wow! why. the goal was simple, to separate the prefix length by which HD is measured from actual assignment size. that is all. why could someone think this bad? i am very confused. randy