Re: [sig-policy] prop-039-v001: A proposal to improve reachability of ne
The fundamental problem is that ISPs use historical "bogon" filters, and
they ignore frequent messaging that these filters are dynamic and need
frequent updating:
- Frequent postings by the RIRs on all the NOG lists don't help.
- Project Cymru have an accurate BGP bogon feed which more ISPs should
be using, but most have never heard of:
http://www.cymru.com/Bogons/index.html and
http://www.cymru.com/BGP/bogon-rs.html
- The RIRs have the debogon project at
http://www.ris.ripe.net/debogon/debogon.html but that's ignored
It's not the lack of info out there, so simply adding more overhead and
more expense seems a waste of time to me.
If the policy proposal talked about greater ISP education on the
problems of bogon filtering as part of *all* the RIR member outreach,
then it would make more sense. Fix the cause of the problem, not add
ever more complexity and bureaucracy to existing proposed solutions.
philip
--
Toshiyuki Hosaka said the following on 7/8/06 17:14:
> Dear SIG members
>
> The proposal "A proposal to improve reachability of new IANA blocks" has
> been sent to the Policy SIG for review. It will be presented at the
> Policy SIG at APNIC 22 in Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 4-8 September 2006. You are
> invited to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list before
> the meeting.
>
> The proposal's history can be found at:
>
> http://www.apnic.net/docs/policy/proposals/prop-039-v001.html
>
> Regards,
>
> Toshiyuki Hosaka
> Policy SIG
> hosaka at nic dot ad dot jp
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> prop-039-v001: A proposal to improve reachability of new IANA blocks
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> Author: Tomoya Yoshida
> <yoshida at ocn dot ad dot jp>
>
> Version: 1
>
> Date: 7 August 2006
>
>
> Introduction
> ------------
>
> The objective of this proposal is to establish basis of cooperation
> between RIRs/ISPs to test and ensure routability of new IANA
> allocations to RIRs.
>
>
> Summary of the current problem
> ------------------------------
>
> APNIC and some of the RIRs provide a trial service for testing
> reachability and routability of new IANA allocations.
>
> http://www.ris.ripe.net/debogon/debogon.html
>
> However, problems still remains for ISPs that almost all such
> allocations are unreachable and unable to use immediately after
> allocations. There are a number of cases which an allocated block
> remain unreachable upto one year after the allocation is made.
>
> Situation in other RIRs
> -----------------------
>
> RIPE and AfriNIC conduct a trial service jointly with APNIC, however
> there are same situation in other RIRs.
>
> (*) Needs confirmation with RIPE and AfriNIC
>
> Details of this proposal
> ------------------------
>
> 1) Propose a full scale service for de-bogonizing new IANA allocations
> instead of a trial service currently conducted for 121/8,122/8,123/8
> (Provide an enviroment where multiple reachability can be secured for
> a single /8 as much as possible).
>
> 2) Propose RIRs to estabilish a site for ISPs to confirm reachability
> e.g. Enable automatic notification of theicmp/traceroute from RIRs to
> ISP's site by registering ISP's own icmp/traceroute testing servers
> to RIRs. Details of the implementation will be left up to APNIC.
>
> 3) Propose to provide the same service for IPv6 allocations.
>
> 4) Propose the service by all RIRs and not be restricted within the AP
> region.
>
>
> Pros/Cons
> ---------
>
> Advantages:
>
> + LIRs will be able to use the address space more quicker than
> before after an allocation as a result of de-bogonization
>
> + Will be able to determine the cause of unreachability and other
> network problems
>
> + LIRs also will be able to check whether their bogon filtering is
> updated or not
>
> + RIRs will be able to understand or confirm situation of
> reachability or routability of new IANA allocations
>
> Disadvantages:
>
> + May need to consider whether its benefits scale the expenses
>
> Additional note:
>
> May able to convert the use of the address ranges reserved for
> reachability testing for assignments to critical networks at the
> time of IPv4 address exhaustion.
>
>
> Effect on APNIC
> ---------------
> Will improve reachability or routability of new IANA blocks for members.
>
>
> Effect on NIRs
> --------------
> Will improve reachability or routability of new IANA blocks for members.
>
>
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
