Re: [sig-policy] Status: prop-065: Format for delegation and recording o

To: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>, James Spenceley <james at vocus dot com dot au>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Status: prop-065: Format for delegation and recording of 4-byte AS numbers
From: Philip Smith <pfs at cisco dot com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:05:38 +1000
Authentication-results: syd-dkim-1; header.From=pfs@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/syddkim1002 verified; );
Cc: Policy SIG <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <4904E383.1000900 at psg dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Cisco Systems
References: <4904E383.1000900@psg.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105)


philip
--

Randy Bush said the following on 27/10/08 07:39:
> Dear colleagues
> 
> The eight-week final comment period for the proposal 'Format for
> delegation and recording of 4-byte AS numbers' has now ended.
> 
> This APNIC proposal has prompted the submission of an Internet Draft to
> the IETF. This proposed standards document is now in the final
> stages of IETF review and we hope that it will be published before the
> end of 2008 as a Proposed Standard RFC. The IETF document status can be
> found at:
> 
>      http://tools.ietf.org/wg/idr/draft-ietf-idr-as-representation
> 
> Because of this, after consulting the mailing list, the Policy SIG
> Chairs have decided to defer forwarding the APNIC proposal to the APNIC
> EC for endorsement until the IETF and RFC Editor processes have
> completed. However, if, after a period of two months, an RFC has not
> been published, we will ask the APNIC EC to endorse the proposal.
> 
> For a detailed history of this proposal see:
> 
>      http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-065-v001.html
> 
> Regards
> APNIC Policy SIG Chairs
> Randy Bush
> Jian Zhang