Re: [sig-policy] update regarding prop-061
- To: Philip Smith <pfs at cisco dot com>
- Subject: Re: [sig-policy] update regarding prop-061
- From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:31:16 +0900
- Cc: APNIC Policy SIG List <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
- Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
- In-reply-to: <49418ED4.5040303 at cisco dot com>
- List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
- List-help: <mailto:email@example.com?subject=help>
- List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
- List-post: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <49418ED4.email@example.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20081204 Thunderbird/3.0b1
FYI, RFC5398 has just been published by the IETF. In it, it states that:
this is great news!
As indicated by the Policy SIG chairs at the end of October, there is no longer any need for prop-061 to be implemented by APNIC.
indeed. as we have not sent it to the EC, i believe that, unless there is objection, we can just let it die.
I'd like to thank the RFC author, Geoff Huston
indeed! randy, for the policy sig