Re: [sig-policy] sig-policy Digest, Vol 57, Issue 3

To: "zhaowei" <zhaowei at cnnic dot cn>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] sig-policy Digest, Vol 57, Issue 3
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:09:25 +0800
Cc: sig-policy at apnic dot net
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <433890754.08691 at cnnic dot cn>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <433712890.20075@cnnic.cn> <433890754.08691@cnnic.cn>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.3 (i386-apple-darwin9.6.0) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)


uh, not that i am aware from here in hk airport :)

> Coz on APNIC website it says that prop-70 was submitted to policy
> SIG mailing list but it is not in there.

you appended a message about prop-0069.  so i am quite confused,
which is not unusual.

but sam tells me the message is in the archives.  so you may want
to debug mail problems somewhere between apnic, your mail admins,
and your client.

randy