[sig-policy] Re: [sig-policy] Requests from routing/packeting concerns①
> On 17/02/2009, at 7:56 PM, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>> I think the idea is more like making sure not to purchase address space
>> used by an ISP with bad reputation. Which is likely to be black
>> listed/gets filtered.
> perhaps a dinner discussion, but do you think that companies will have
> the luxury of making that decision?
i thought that was a good point, so I shared your point on a Japanese
mailing list. Comments were:
You are probably right about not having a choice but you'd like to at
least want to know what it takes to get those problems solved and
obtain the space, being aware of what the risks would be.
>> Right. I like the expression "lemon prefix" - gives me a good visual
>> image of what it's like to get one. thanks for feedback.
> You're welcome, I think. The side-step to this is my doubt that the
> term will ever be applied. I really don't think that there will be any
> substantial difference in value between two equal sized prefixes from
> different sources. It a demand driven market, a buyer will purchase what
> ever they can get, and will do whatever it takes to make the prefix
> route-able and either pass on that cost to the consumer or absorb it.
exactly. and the reason for JP operators asking for information is
* you want to know how much work/cost they must go through to make the
* it would help to do "whatever it takes" to make the prefix routable
for the obtained space.