Re: [sig-policy] Inter-registry transfers

To: Policy SIG <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Inter-registry transfers
From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic dot ad dot jp>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:04:48 +0900
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <m27i3nw2qp.wl%randy at psg dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <49954E5C.90500@mesh.ad.jp> <m2skmiv82a.wl%randy@psg.com> <49995358.60508@nic.ad.jp> <79EEB4C1-425E-418D-B10A-186A969C3CF7@apnic.net> <499CC1D6.4020903@nic.ad.jp> <m27i3nw2qp.wl%randy@psg.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)

>> So transfers between APNIC and NIR account holders will not be allowed
>> if prop-068 gets rejected.
>> ...
>> BTW, am I right in assuming that prop-067 doesn't make this distiction?
>> (transfers between APNIC and NIR account holders are accepted if the
>> proposal reaches consensus)
> 
> yes.  but 
> 
> < chair hat == on >
> 
> i think we should focus on what we as a community want for each aspect
> of the transfer issue, and not think of it as choosing between
> particular current proposals.  i hope what we will end up with is an
> amalgam of the current proposals into one that meets the community's
> consensus and needs.
> 

agree. makes sense to me.

so I suppose what i'd be interested to hear from the community would be

 a. inter RIR transfers
 b. inter APNIC-NIR tranfers

seperately, rather than combining them as inter registry trasnfers.

hope that would make sense to others too.


izumi