Re: [sig-policy] Address Transfer Policy Proposal

To: Andy Linton <asjl at lpnz dot org>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Address Transfer Policy Proposal
From: Terry Manderson <terry at terrym dot net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:06:02 +1000
Cc: sig-policy <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <9393CB4C-548D-4C24-9388-532AFCE527B5 at lpnz dot org>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <F72ACDCB-D54B-434C-B133-95A94C44C6A9@apnic.net> <AA9D0B9A-A156-4DE8-BDD7-F31690B88175@apnic.net> <4A5EA683.5070702@nic.ad.jp><4A5EAF49.2070201@lpnz.org> <4A5EB00C.9000504@nic.ad.jp><ED960528-E62C-4F98-A081-5D4E2DAEA7D6@terrym.net> <05C56983-902F-49F4-BC84-6C997FA64407@apnic.net> <F3C84020E03AC042A63FEDCAAAC4C662429A3D@SBB-MBEX-16V.bb.local> <9393CB4C-548D-4C24-9388-532AFCE527B5@lpnz.org>
Sender: Terry Manderson <terry.mndrsn@gmail.com>


On 17/07/2009, at 6:17 AM, Andy Linton wrote:

"a notice of application will be posted for at least 7 days on the
APNIC website"


I also have some concerns for this point.
As Geoff already mentioned, it conflicts with current policy for
confidentiality between APNIC and members,
and the effect is not so clear.


I am comfortable if this isn't in the proposal because of the
confidentiality problem and also because I trust the APNIC and other

hostmasters to do the right thing if/when these applications arelodged.


I expect that statistics of the number of these applications will be
made available (with confidentiality preserved) and that the
hostmaster staff would alert senior management, the EC and this group
if major abuse appeared to be happening. If Terry is willing to modify
his proposal it starts to look as if we have something that many of us
can agree on.

Given that "notice of application" actually doesn't mean to post the

member's application to the website nor impose on the privacy and

confidentiality of the member afforded by the membership agreement, do

you still feel that a modification is required?


Terry