Re: [sig-policy] Address Transfer Policy Proposal

To: sig-policy <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Address Transfer Policy Proposal
From: Andy Linton <asjl at lpnz dot org>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:25:26 +1200
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <4A61A57E.2060004 at cisco dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <F72ACDCB-D54B-434C-B133-95A94C44C6A9@apnic.net> <AA9D0B9A-A156-4DE8-BDD7-F31690B88175@apnic.net> <4A5EA683.5070702@nic.ad.jp><4A5EAF49.2070201@lpnz.org> <4A5EB00C.9000504@nic.ad.jp><ED960528-E62C-4F98-A081-5D4E2DAEA7D6@terrym.net><05C56983-902F-49F4-BC84-6C997FA64407@apnic.net> <99C7ABB5-D340-4E71-B612-FC6456A00E4B@terrym.net> <F3C84020E03AC042A63FEDCAAAC4C662429A41@SBB-MBEX-16V.bb.local> <DC5A93F4-8E5A-48D2-B9E7-9A31E2592836@apnic.net> <4A601611.2030801@lpnz.org> <2D5456FF-8405-4E74-B798-044CA76E005E@terrym.net> <4A61A57E.2060004@cisco.com>


On 18/07/2009, at 22:35 , Philip Smith wrote:

Agreed, we don't need reference to the EC for the reason you state,
Terry. I think the second and third paras could simply be merged as:

----
Under exceptional circumstances a member may submit an application for
further assignments or allocations earlier than this time. The APNIC
secretariat will monitor these exceptional requests carefully and
publish comprehensive statistics on a regular basis. Without
identifying any member organization, these statistics will record the

numbers of requests and the outcome, the economy that the requestscome

from and clearly identify if any member has made more that one request
under these provisions.
----



Philip,

I'm comfortable with this change - I'm guessing Terry will be as well.

How about the others who've commented in the last days? Anybody else?

Regards,
andy