Re: [sig-policy] prop-085: Eligibility for critical infrastructureassign

To: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-085: Eligibility for critical infrastructureassignments from the final /8
From: Gaurab Raj Upadhaya <gaurab at lahai dot com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:17:22 +0100
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <4C6D1D42.5030801 at nic dot ad dot jp>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <482182673.27379@cnnic.cn> <2D01DAA7-A036-4532-8D31-D3F632EEAA33@terrym.net> <4C6D1D42.5030801@nic.ad.jp>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2

Hash: SHA1

On 8/19/10 1:02 PM, Izumi Okutani wrote:

> (i.e, secure assignments for critical infrastructures from the reserved
> block today, even after the regular APNIC pool runs out)
> 
> The current policy is ambiguous if we can continue to allow assignments
> from this reserved block after regular APNIC pool runs out, so I can see
> that it's worth explicitly defining this.

Yes, that was my point as well. Critical Infrastructure assignments from
the final /8 should only happen after the current reserved blocks runs out.

- -gaurab


- -- 

http://www.gaurab.org.np/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkxtPPIACgkQSo7fU26F3X2XpwCgwJlwTMN90z3yMLokCu7YP9CT
sE0An0kuGxWvg4O30xuBeGEPtoR5l22P
=yB3C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----