Re: [sig-policy] prop-085: Eligibility for critical infrastructureassign

To: Terence Zhang YH <zhangyinghao at cnnic dot cn>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-085: Eligibility for critical infrastructureassignments from the final /8
From: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann dot org>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:01:15 -0700
Cc: "sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net" <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <021001cb401a$ac9feb00$226df1da@laptop4j>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <482182673.27379@cnnic.cn> <482186730.04569@cnnic.cn> <013501cb400c$834fee70$226df1da@laptop4j> <482274286.24738@cnnic.cn> <021001cb401a$ac9feb00$226df1da@laptop4j>


On Aug 19, 2010, at 8:49 PM, Terence Zhang YH wrote:

[…]

> Given the recent discussion, I think it may be helpful for me to consolidate certain ambiguous points and 
> let the secretariat clarify. 

Agreed.

Regards,

Leo