Re: [sig-policy] prop-085: Eligibility for critical infrastructure assig

To: Terence Zhang YH <zhangyinghao at cnnic dot cn>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-085: Eligibility for critical infrastructure assignments from the final /8
From: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann dot org>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:25:59 -0700
Cc: Philip Smith <pfs at cisco dot com>, "sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net" <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <00e701cb4321$a45b4de0$0900a8c0@laptop4j>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <482182673.27379@cnnic.cn> <2D01DAA7-A036-4532-8D31-D3F632EEAA33@terrym.net> <482219336.10044@cnnic.cn><482273705.23067@cnnic.cn> <482276913.30522@cnnic.cn><482285403.14935@cnnic.cn> <482286488.17539@cnnic.cn> <482292649.31845@cnnic.cn> <482395332.29716@cnnic.cn> <482525246.07616@cnnic.cn> <00e701cb4321$a45b4de0$0900a8c0@laptop4j>

On Aug 23, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Terence Zhang YH wrote:

[…]

> But if you monitor the mailing list discussion, you can feel that there are still
> some people don't fully realize and understand the effect of the final /8 policy, 
> some people still assume we can make CI assignment during final /8 phase. 
> That's why I made that clarification. 

To be clear, I am not suggesting a change to the policy, merely that I do not think the language currently in place says what has been agreed. I would support improvements to the language.

Regards,

Leo Vegoda