Re: [sig-policy] prop-085: Eligibility for critical infrastructure assig
- To: "Terence Zhang YH" <zhangyinghao at cnnic dot cn>
- Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-085: Eligibility for critical infrastructure assignments from the final /8
- From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 01:42:30 +0900
- Cc: Philip Smith <pfs at cisco dot com>, sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
- Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
- In-reply-to: <482667464.25544 at cnnic dot cn>
- List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
- List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
- List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
- List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
- List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <482182673.27379@cnnic.cn> <2D01DAA7-A036-4532-8D31-D3F632EEAA33@terrym.net> <482219336.10044@cnnic.cn> <482273705.23067@cnnic.cn> <482276913.30522@cnnic.cn> <482285403.14935@cnnic.cn> <482286488.17539@cnnic.cn> <482292649.31845@cnnic.cn> <482395332.29716@cnnic.cn> <482525246.07616@cnnic.cn> <482609009.07246@cnnic.cn> <482652178.04433@cnnic.cn> <482667464.25544@cnnic.cn>
- User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
> (IDN ccTLDs) Fast Track Process and there are ongoing discussion on > new generic top-level domain (gTLDs) programs, we can expect dozens of > IDN ccTLDs and gTLDs will be created in the next few years. > Those new TLD operators may not have existing IPv4 addresses. and, along with a million other folk, they will learn that ipv4 has run out. what is it people don't get about GONE, NO MORE, WE'RE OUT, THERE ARE NONE, WE AIN'T GOT ANY, ...? they can use space from their upstreams. i am sure they will figure it out. [ unless, as pfs points out, they qaulify under the final /8 policy ] randy