Re: [sig-policy] prop-085: Eligibility for critical infrastructure assig
- To: Gaurab Raj Upadhaya <gaurab at lahai dot com>
- Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-085: Eligibility for critical infrastructure assignments from the final /8
- From: Seiichi Kawamura <kawamucho at mesh dot ad dot jp>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:40:05 +0900
- Cc: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>, sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
- Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
- In-reply-to: <4C749916.1040701 at lahai dot com>
- List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
- List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
- List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
- List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
- List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <482182673.27379@cnnic.cn> <2D01DAA7-A036-4532-8D31-D3F632EEAA33@terrym.net> <482219336.10044@cnnic.cn> <482273705.23067@cnnic.cn> <482276913.30522@cnnic.cn> <482285403.14935@cnnic.cn> <482286488.17539@cnnic.cn> <482292649.31845@cnnic.cn> <482395332.29716@cnnic.cn> <482525246.07616@cnnic.cn> <482609009.07246@cnnic.cn> <482652178.04433@cnnic.cn> <482667464.25544@cnnic.cn> <482668156.26293@cnnic.cn> <482692841.19969@cnnic.cn> <m27hjfr2hc.wl%randy@psg.com> <4C7471E3.4020306@lpnz.org> <4C7487AA.4000201@lahai.com> <m28w3vpeya.wl%randy@psg.com> <4C749916.1040701@lahai.com>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
Hash: SHA1 Gaurab Raj Upadhaya wrote: > On 8/25/10 4:07 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > >> actually, i have proposed to terence that he and i write a proposal to >> reduce the minimum allocation to /24 when the last /8 days arrive. > > My thinking as well. I support this approach rather then writing > policies for corner cases. This is a much better idea. I haven't heard anyone speak out in first person yet though... so I really don't understand if there really is a need. But then again, what do I know...I like this better. Regards, Seiichi > > -gaurab > > > -- > > http://www.gaurab.org.np/ > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAkx0nqQACgkQcrhTYfxyMkJ1RwCcCWwUrs8MWiGN1Y8lGqnGmELg A4wAnRjdkk+Hm8y0zie6f/1Jeuo5g7t1 =9r2t -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----