Re: [sig-policy] prop-084: Frequent whois information update request

To: "tk at abusix dot com" <tk at abusix dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-084: Frequent whois information update request
From: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann dot org>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:58:12 -0700
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: "sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net" <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <4C758E41.7050602 at abusix dot org>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <m2lj9uwhjb.wl%randy@psg.com> <4C71D2D1.6040303@apnic.net> <4C71D5B8.6090405@apnic.net> <3364960405632427060@unknownmsgid> <m2d3t9wwa1.wl%randy@psg.com> <4C735B8C.9010508@apnic.net> <4C758E41.7050602@abusix.org>
Thread-index: ActEoJyV1zOUzK9fTO6T2o5nkZM0OQ==
Thread-topic: [sig-policy] prop-084: Frequent whois information update request


On 25 Aug 2010, at 2:42, Tobias Knecht wrote:

> can we decide on putting all historical resources on the invalid list.

Do you already know that all contact information for all historical resources is invalid? If not, are you not suggesting that APNIC publish a statement which it does not know to be true? That seems most odd.

I can only assume that I have misunderstood what you mean. I'd be grateful if you could clarify.

Many thanks,

Leo