Re: [sig-policy] prop-086: Global policy for IPv4 allocations by the IAN
- To: Owen DeLong <owen at delong dot com>
- Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-086: Global policy for IPv4 allocations by the IANA post exhaustion
- From: "Hannigan, Martin" <marty at akamai dot com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:02:53 -0400
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Cc: Philip Smith <pfs at cisco dot com>, Policy SIG <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
- Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
- In-reply-to: <6734BCD0-8C9E-427E-B54A-C28B0923D700 at delong dot com>
- List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
- List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
- List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
- List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
- List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
- Reply-to: "Hannigan, Martin" <marty@akamai.com>
- Thread-index: ActEv6qSn0F592dORNSAxAbyM73ORwAC4Is5
- Thread-topic: [sig-policy] prop-086: Global policy for IPv4 allocations by the IANA post exhaustion
- User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.6.0.100712
On 8/25/10 9:40 PM, "Owen DeLong" <owen at delong dot com> wrote: > > On Aug 25, 2010, at 6:29 PM, Hannigan, Martin wrote: > >> >> >> [ snip ] >> >> But more importantly, transfers were not banned. >> > Transfers of space received under this policy are banned by > this policy. Transfers in general are not banned. That ban > could be lifted by subsequent global policy action, but, absent > an additional global policy change, yes, this proposal would > ban such transfers. That is wholly inaccurate. Transfers of space assigned under this policy are not allowed unless there is either a globally coordinated or global policy in place defining how transfers will occur globally. As I had mentioned to Phillip, that's a policy knob that can be turned without reworking the entire policy and at the option of the RIR's. The suggestion speaks volumes. Best, -M<