Re: [sig-policy] prop-086: Global policy for IPv4 allocations by the IAN

To: Philip Smith <pfs at cisco dot com>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-086: Global policy for IPv4 allocations by the IANA post exhaustion
From: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:48:32 +0900
Cc: Policy SIG <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <4C75EFA4.4010008 at cisco dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <m2wrsm2yzz.wl%randy@psg.com> <4C69230E.4090408@cisco.com> <20100825220053.GC19734@minilime.local> <4C75C673.10209@cisco.com> <20100826022312.GB23044@minilime.local> <4C75EC09.30200@cisco.com> <m2hbiiknaw.wl%randy@psg.com> <4C75EFA4.4010008@cisco.com>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

>> more, not just single serve.
>> much more lax than any other.
> Agreed. It needs to be firmed up to be comparable with other RIR soft
> landing policies. Better to do that within ARIN PDP 

or not.  the point is that, unless and until it is, the policy proposal
in $subject is quite ill-advised unless you are arin.

randy