Re: [sig-policy] Need to understand logic behind assigning /64IPv6 addre

To: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Need to understand logic behind assigning /64IPv6 addresses
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka at globaltransit dot net>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:56:11 +0800
Cc: Randy Bush <randy at psg dot com>, APNIC Address Policy SIG <sig-policy at apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
In-reply-to: <m262krd5zo.wl%randy at psg dot com>
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Global Transit International
References: <CA996512.4723F%skeeve@eintellego.net> <1316232393.27438.YahooMailNeo@web110209.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <m262krd5zo.wl%randy@psg.com>
Reply-to: mtinka@globaltransit.net
User-agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.37.6-0.7-desktop; KDE/4.6.0; i686; ; )

wrote:

> it is not that i disagree with your arguments.  it's just
> that i lost the selfsame arguments some years ago.  the
> current generally accepted 'wisdom,' with little
> supporting measurement, is that iv6 address space is
> effectively infinite and the ipv6 routing table is a
> very scarce resource.  that this resembles pigs at a
> trough constructing a barrier to entry is not a widely
> held perception.

+1.

Mark.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.