APNIC Home APNIC Open Policy Meeting 11
  APNIC Meeting Menu  Register
  APNIC Meeting Menu  Sponsors
  APNIC Meeting Menu  SIGs
  APNIC Meeting Menu  BOFs
  APNIC Meeting Menu  EC Election
  APNIC Meeting Menu  Program
  APNIC Meeting Menu  AMM
  APNIC Meeting Menu  HM Consultation
  APNIC Meeting Menu  Social Event
  APNIC Meeting Menu  Evaluation
  APNIC Meeting Menu  APRICOT 2001
  APNIC Meeting Menu  Archive
  APNIC Meeting Menu  Meeting Home
  APNIC Meeting Menu  APNIC Home

APNIC Open Policy Meeting

SIG: Address policy (New Technology)

Wednesday 28 February 2001, Putra World Trade Centre, Kuala Lumpur
 Minutes

    Meeting commenced:  11:00 am

    Chair: Geoff Huston

The Chair explained that the agenda for this session had been amended to include presentations that were not able to be given during the Routing SIG due to a lack of time.

    Presentations

  1. Routing Information Service (RIS) - Mirjam Kuhne, RIPE NCC
  2. [Presentation (ppt)]

    This presentation provided an overview of the RIS project at RIPE NCC.

    Questions and discussion - No questions or discussion.

  3. Routing Registry Consistency Check (RRCC) - Andrei Robachevsky, RIPE NCC
  4. [Presentation (ppt)]

    This presentation provided an overview of the RRCC project at RIPE NCC.

    Questions and discussion

    There was a general discussion about emerging problems with routing practices that are in operation in the Internet currently.
  5. MPLS-IX New IX Architecture - Ikuo Nakagawa, INTEC
  6. [Presentation (pdf)]

    This presentation considered the use of MPLS as an IX architecture.

    Questions and discussion

    There was a question about whether there has been any customer interest in this service so far. It was explained that there has been interest from those currently paying for expensive broadband access.

    It was observed that it is difficult to control traffic using MPLS. It was argued that the OSPF interior network that interconnects the boundary router cannot do open routing as a provider network. Otherwise it would have policies that would stop paths reaching each other. It was argued that company business plans do not put in place the barriers that would be needed to make this technique work. In other words, it was argued, putting routing policies in place within this network would reduce the utility of the network and would prevent peering with other networks. It was suggested that the complexity of routing policy behind this model would require a constrictive business model.

    Meeting closed: 12:20 pm

    Minuted by: Gerard Ross




APNIC Meeting Navigation Address policy (New Technology)


Home | MyAPNIC | Info & FAQ | Services | Training | Meetings | Membership | Policy | Internet community | Search
Last modified | © 1999 - APNIC Pty. Ltd.
Comments to: )">webmaster@apnic.net | Privacy statement | RSS Really Simple Syndication