______________________________________________________________________

DRAFT TRANSCRIPT

Session:       APNIC Member Meeting
Date:          Friday 3 March 2006
Time:          2.00pm

Presentation:  IPv6 technical SIG report
Presenter:     Kazu Yamamoto
			       
______________________________________________________________________



PAUL WILSON:

And the next is Kazu Yamamoto who will be presenting about the IPv6
technical SIG.

KAZU YAMAMOTO:

Hi. This is Kazu Yamamoto. I will make a brief summary of the IPv6
Technical SIG, which was held on 1st March.

Well, we had around 40 attendance and there was no action items.
And we had seven information presentations. So let me explain them
briefly.

Well, four presentations were status reports.

IPv6 update was presented by Arth from APNIC. And this is the
semi-annual statistic report and the good news is the number of
assignments registered in whois database is increasing.

And the second presentation is from Hosaka-san, JPNIC. His title
was 'JPNIC IPv6 registry service update report'. And he explained
the statistics in Japan and he also explained that JPNIC made a
bulk data exchange system for assignment data. So congratulations
to JPNIC.

And third presentation is made by Jordi and he explained 'IPv6
deployment in Latin America and Caribbean'. And he said that IPv6
was incompetent active before June 2005. But, this morning, German
explained LACNIC finally held the IPv6 Tour and Jordi said 3,000
and German said 2,500. I don't know which one is correct. But,
anyway, many people trained. That is very good news.

GERMAN VALDEZ:

My correction. The 2,500 is only the IPv6 Tour. That LACNIC trained
and Jordi is including two more events that was held by Jordi and
LACNIC didn't have any participation in those in Colombia and Peru?

JORDI PALET:

Lima and Bogota, yes.

KAZU YAMAMOTO:

Thank you for your clarification.

JORDI PALET:

Actually when I saw this morning the figures from German, it's not
3,000. It's 2,500 from the official IPv6 Tour and then we had
800-something in Lima and almost 600 in Bogota. So it's 3,000 and
a bit more.

KAZU YAMAMOTO:

A bit more. OK. Thank you.

And the most important issue for this time is deprecation of ip6.int.
And we had three presentations relating to it.

Sanjaya, APNIC, make a presentation on ip6.int deprecation project
report. He explained all RIRs agreed to coordinate as a global
activity and that the cut-off date is 1st of June 2006. This is not
the final date but very firm. But he also explained in a schedule
including announcement and when they notify, they will notify root
ip6.int.

And the next presentation, made by me, whose title is 'technical
consideration of deprecation of ip6.int'. We with the WIDE Project
expect no fatal thing will happen because of deprecation of ip6.int.
And the quality of reverse mapping would be better, OK? And if a
server is - application server is running with IPv6-only resolver,
side effects would happen. But it is rare and not fatal. So there
is no problem with deprecation of ip6.int, I believe.

And the final one is made by Yamasaki-san, JPNIC, a progress report
for ip6.int deprecation in Japan. So JPNIC made several announcement
to LIRs and JPNIC is continuing measurement of transition from
ip6.int to ip6.arpa. OK, that's it.

PAUL WILSON:

Thank you. Any questions?

APPLAUSE